Monday, December 29, 2025

A Maid Peerless

As a mid-Christmastide treat, here is Herbert Howells’ setting of an early sixteenth-century carol in praise of Mary, A Maid Peerless.  This piece had a long gestation: originally composed in 1931, it was revised in 1951 and 1971.  Tom Edney has pointed out the resemblance its radiance bears to Howells’ later choral music, especially Hymnus Paradisi.  The recording below, for upper voices and orchestra, is sung by the choristers of St. Paul’s Cathedral, London.

The source of the text is a set of bass parts for twenty part-songs that was printed in 1530 by Wynkyn de Worde; unfortunately the equivalent volumes for the other parts have not survived.  A digitised version of the volume (now at the British Library, shelfmark k.1.e.1, ff. 11–13) can be viewed here.

A Maid peerless hath borne God’s son.
Nature gave place when ghostly grace
Subdued reason.
A Maid peerless hath borne God’s Son.
Alleluia.
As for beauty,
Or high gentry,
She is the flower
By God elect,
For this effect,
Man to succour.
Of Virgins Queen,
Lodestar of Light
Who to honour
We ought endeavour
Day and Night:
A Maid peerless hath borne God’s son.
Alleluia.

The words are more clearly audible, though the acoustic less ethereal, in this version for women’s voices and piano (with David Hill conducting the Ikon choir):

Thursday, December 25, 2025

Merry Christmas!

And so another year draws towards its close; another Advent leads us to the manger-side and, we are told, to the fruition of our hopes.  Again the question is asked of us: do we believe that this small bemused knot of being, this wriggling, inarticulate bundle, this tiny brother to us, is the Son of God Almighty, is the answer to our prayers?  This year has been as full as any other of gratuitous violence, of greed, of injustice, of licence, of untruth, of vandalism, of wrong-doing of both the red-hot and the cold and calculated varieties.  It has contained illness, or frustration, or loneliness, or uncertainty.  Or it seems to have allowed our own failures to have defeated us.  And to live in Britain has been to observe continued cultural decline, even a new darkening of the national mood, as fundamental questions about the future of our country are exposed, some for the first time in centuries, and lacking any easy resolution; meanwhile, revolutions both moral and technological pose new challenges to human dignity even as their advantages seem irresistible to many.  Even the talk of a ‘Quiet Revival’ in the churches can seem like small beer in the face of it all.  Sometimes — indeed, often — we long, as the Israelites did, for Christ to come marching over the hills with a massed army, and liberate us by the sword.

But instead we find this child.  This is the shock, the twist, the wit, of Christianity, and of its author: the idea that a baby will have the last word — that already He is the last word.  Is this a joke?  Well, perhaps in a way it is, in its sheer surprise, its drop-shot deftness.  But not in its essence.  For God takes His love seriously: He means exactly what He says and does.  Any humour in the situation is at the devil’s expense, not ours.  The idea alone — even to a sceptic, even as a proposition entertained merely for argument’s sake — is so shocking as almost to defy formulation in words: that God Himself (and not merely ‘a god’) should be born of human woman, should clothe Himself in our nature, compromised as it is, and take on our humanity entirely, even while remaining entirely Himself.  The very idea that God should consider a human body fit for habitation — or at least that He should choose to make it fit for habitation simply by inhabiting it — shows us that here we are not dealing with spirit-worlds, or Pantheons, or icons of our desires, or even any normal human idea of God, but with a dramatic God outside our imaginings: not bribable or capricious or tyrannical, but careful yet surprising, gentle yet deliberate, many-dimensional, knowing His own mind: in other words, real.  This Incarnation, this enfleshment — long before we even consider the Passion and the Resurrection — throws open the door of understanding to us.  Now we see what God is really all about: it is this child, ostensibly needing us more than we need him, who is our longed-for liberator, whose conquest will be final and unanswerable.

It does not mean that we are wrong to ask for an end to the world’s evil.  One day it will all indeed be defeated, and by this same minuscule right fist.  Yesterday’s antiphon at the beginning of Mass, the penultimate of the Great Advent Antiphons, ‘O Rex Gentium’, assured us of this: of Christ’s ultimate supremacy over all things, including temporal, even if the opposition continues to work what havoc it can while it may.  But the gift of a child, not a massed army, shows us that evil will be defeated not only in general but in minute particulars: not only the enormous wrongs with their towering pillars of smoke, but all the snide creeping erroneous whisperings that conspire in ourselves and in our nature.  Hence the confidence and uncompromised serenity of the Star above Bethlehem, sign of the tiny child by whom all despair will be defeated and all loss made good.  Hence, today, the final O antiphon, we acknowledge the true fulfilment of the old promise: ‘O Emmanuel’ — God with us, and far more closely than we can imagine.

Wishing all readers a very merry Christmas.

The choir of Ely cathedral sing David Willcocks’ arrangement of Prudentius’ hymn:

Of the Father’s heart begotten
Ere the world from chaos rose,
He is Alpha: from that Fountain,
All that is and hath been flows;
He is Omega, of all things
Yet to come the mystic Close,
Evermore and evermore.

By his word was all created;
He commanded and ’twas done;
Earth and sky and boundless ocean,
Universe of three in one,
All that sees the moon’s soft radiance,
All that breathes beneath the sun,
Evermore and evermore.

He assumed this mortal body,
Frail and feeble, doomed to die,
That the race from dust created
Might not perish utterly,
Which the dreadful Law had sentenced
In the depths of hell to lie,
Evermore and evermore.

O how blest that wondrous birthday,
When the Maid the curse retrieved,
Brought to birth mankind’s salvation,
By the Holy Ghost conceived,
And the Babe, the world’s Redeemer,
In her loving arms received,
Evermore and evermore.

This is he, whom seer and sybil
Sang in ages long gone by;
This is he of old revealèd
In the page of prophecy;
Lo! he comes, the promised Saviour;
Let the world his praises cry!
Evermore and evermore.

Sing, ye heights of heaven, his praises;
Angels and Archangels, sing!
Wheresoe’er ye be, ye faithful,
Let your joyous anthems ring,
Every tongue his name confessing,
Countless voices answering,
Evermore and evermore.

Aurelius Clemens Prudentius (348–c. 410), tr. R. F. Davis (1866–1937)

Wednesday, December 24, 2025

Shippea Hill: in pride of second place

It’s that time of year again!  The Office of Rail and Road has released its annual statistics of passenger numbers per railway station, and as usual I have headed immediately for the lower extremities of the league table with one particular and cherished name in mind.  How had everyone’s favourite bleak fenland outpost done, Shippea Hill, with its tenuous service to an almost totally uninhabited tract of Cambridgeshire farmland?

Second to last!  With 76 passengers, and in 2,585th place, Shippea Hill is this year’s second-least-used station, after Elton and Orton in Nottinghamshire with 68.  Shippea Hill is mentioned in the press release as one of the five most-neglected stations, but it should still attract less limelight than it did ten years ago, when, with 22 recorded passengers in 2014/15 and only 12 in 2015/16, it earned the crown of Britain’s most-non-used station two years running.  Alas, or perhaps fortunately, this made it a victim of its own non-success: the hordes of people (relatively speaking) who then organised trips to the station with the express aim of trying to boost its statistics (for there could be no other reason) successfully knocked it off the top, or bottom spot, which it has been denied ever since by the likes of Stanlow and Thornton and Redcar British Steel.  This subtle competition does not escape the attention of the Office of Rail and Road, which acknowledges that ‘in previous years, usage at some of the least used stations presented as part of these statistics has increased the following year.  We understand that highlighting the least used stations within these statistics can encourage people to visit them.’

Well, that’s me rumbled.  I have written elsewhere at lengths which I concede must seem extraordinary to any ordinary person about this station with its oft-changed, perennially debatable name and the vague extremity of the Cambridgeshire-Suffolk border that it serves, essentially featureless but for a few million root vegetables and an assortment of Portakabins.  The ‘hill’ in question meets the relevant criteria only by virtue of not being quite below sea level, in contrast to the land around it, and in the absence of any other prominent feature or settlement whatsoever, ‘Shippea Hill’ is at least more helpful than the station’s former name of ‘Mildenhall Road’, Mildenhall itself being fourteen miles away.

Still, after all these years, the service at Shippea Hill remains comically impractical: one weekday morning train towards Norwich at 0726 on Mondays to Fridays, but when it comes to getting back again, nothing.  Only on Saturdays does the 0747 to Norwich have a corresponding return journey (arriving at Shippea Hill at 1615).  There is nothing on Sundays.  There remains no direct service to the neighbouring station of Lakenheath, which, perversely, is served only at weekends and enjoys a lavish Sunday service.

Second-to-last is, I think, the place that suits Shippea Hill the best.  For this is actually the most obscure position: almost as unused as the actual least-used station, but also far less talked about — just avoiding the glare of publicity which would be fatal to its status.  And Shippea Hill by nature shuns celebrity, resisting by its wind-bitten austerity, its sheer remoteness, and the obtuse blankness of the surrounding fenland, as many attempts on conquest as it possibly can.  Of course, penultimate place is also a dangerous position, where its cost-benefit-analysis-failing situation can be highlighted in the red pen of some Director of Finance.  But should such threats ever loom, legions (again, relatively speaking) of Shippea Hill revivalists would, I am sure, rally to the cause.  Long may this unpopulated patch of Fenland revel in its almost entirely unusable service — a level of provision as bleak and inhospitable as the landscape that surrounds it — and congratulations to the 70 who made it there this year!