Sunday, September 03, 2017

A Gipps Symphony in Seattle: thank you, America!


This news should be music to many ears, including for those for whom Seattle is out of reach by quite some distance.  For Ruth Gipps' name has been, as the orchestra's announcement points out, 'inexplicably ignored in her homeland and abroad' and this concert is bound to do something to remedy this.   I have written elsewhere (hereherehere and here) about this composer, whose life should be much better known and music far more easily heard.  It might seem remarkable that a work written in 1945 (and performed in Britain shortly afterwards) is only now being heard in the United States, but in fact this second symphony has received rather more attention than most of her music.  There are four other symphonies, all without a modern recording, for instance.  The scarceness of recordings of her work can be told from my attempt at a discography here.

That Ruth Gipps should remain so neglected 'in her homeland' is particularly lamentable.  A thoroughly interesting and necessary article by the musicologist Simon Brackenborough has recently provided a chronicle of her life and a review of Jill Halstead's biography.  In the early part of Gipps' career she found the wind against her on the grounds of her womanhood.  From the 1960s onwards, however, her career faced a different obstacle: her traditional, tonal idiom ('a direct follow-on from Vaughan Williams, Bliss and Walton') was suddenly at odds with the tide of modernism and atonalism.  To this tide she refused to give in for the rest of her life, and her uncompromising position and strong character perhaps did not, in her own lifetime, help her cause.

I sense that Brackenborough puts Ruth Gipps' neglect down to the former prejudice; that it is as a woman composer that she has suffered most.  This may have been true for the first part of her career, but my impression is that she has paid more heftily for her tonalism and her traditionalism; the anti-traditionalist prejudice, in other words, was the more severe (and she is not the only composer to have been side-lined in this way).  In any case, the main thing for us is to re-invigorate her reputation; there is no excuse now for depriving ourselves of her unsung, unheard, unbroadcast music.

It is very heartening that, from across the Atlantic, America has caught sight of a composer shamefully overlooked in her own country and has, with characteristic gumption, decided to do something about it.  We ought to follow suit, with the help of British orchestras, the BBC and the record companies, and the impetus of some approaching anniversaries.  There is still plenty of time to organise, for example, a proper recording of her other symphonies to mark the twentieth anniversary of her death (2019), and, say, a performance of her piano concerto at the Proms for the centenary of her birth in 2021.

4 comments :

  1. Thank you so much for this post. We at the Seattle Philharmonic are proud to present this masterwork by a composer whose voice should have garnered far more attention than it has to date. And we indeed hope that our efforts spur further interest in Ruth Gipps' compositions.

    Adam Stern
    Music Director and Conductor, Seattle Philharmonic Orchestra

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mr. Stern,

      Thank you for taking the trouble to leave a comment. And thank you for performing this symphony! I would have come a long distance to hear you play it but I'm on the wrong side of the planet so am really out of range. I wish you all the best for the concert - I really think Ruth Gipps has a distinctive voice and certainly hope that her music is brought to many new ears.

      Dominic

      Delete
  2. I attended the performance in Seattle on Saturday, and I was moved to tears. I wept not only because of the beauty of the performance. I wept not only at Mr. Stern's remarkable story about how he secured the performance score. I wept also because I kept thinking about how sad it was that Ms. Gipps's music was kept silent for so long due to shameful prejudice. I also wept at the thought of how proud Ms. Gipps would be! Well done, Seattle Philharmonic!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Leah,

      Thank you for your comment! I too am grateful to the Seattle Philharmonic for bringing my compatriot's music into the limelight. You are fortunate to have heard it - I'm in London and don't have any connection to the orchestra, but if I could have heard this concert I have no doubt that I would have found it very moving. I hope this turns out to be part of a serious Ruth Gipps revival!

      Dominic

      Delete

Please add your thoughts! All civil comments are warmly welcomed.